A Bronze Age Axe from Worthing, West Sussex


A Bronze Age axe from Worthing, West Sussex

During August, we are publishing through this blog a series of new photographs taken by archaeological photographer Ian Cartwright for an online Image Gallery created with the support of the Arts and Humanities Research Council. You can read more about the gallery here, and you can see the whole gallery online here.

Here is the caption for this image:

This is a Bronze Age copper alloy palstave axe with a side loop and high stop ridges. The
 cut made into the blade is the result of metallurgical sampling done in the 1950. The red dot and white writing is also modern, dating from the late 19th or early 20th-century. The meaning of the dot and the text “No. 2” is obscure, although probably relate to its display at some point in the past. But the reference to ‘Forty Acres Field near Worthing’ is more helpful. 

The modern text connects this axe to a historic discovery of Bronze Age hoard of axes, placed in a ceramic urn or vessel, at this site near Worthing in West Sussex. The writing has been copied from earlier text, and the date of 1871 is a mistaken transposition for the correct date of the discovery of the hoard, recorded in the museum’s accession book, of 1877. Pitt-Rivers acquired the axe at some point between 1877 and 1882.

In 1881, John Evans noted in his survey of "The Ancient Bronze Implements, Weapons and Ornaments of Great Britain and Ireland" that ‘nearly thirty palstaves, mostly, I believe, of this type, were found with about twelve socketed celts…and lumps of rough metal, near Worthing, in 1877. The whole had been packed in an urn, of coarse earthenware’. In 1882, the journal Sussex Archaeological Collections reported the name of the person who discovered the hoard was E.C. Patching. 

The axe also connects the axe to another object from Pitt-Rivers’ own collection – a fragment of the urn, on which the text “Fragment of pot in which 40 bronze celts were found near Worthing in 1877”. Further research into this find-spot could yield further details about the hoard and the fate of the other axes found in it. The text present on the axe is a reminder of the dangers of introduced errors with each layer of copying and re-writing in museum documentation. 

(Pitt Rivers Museum Accession Number 1884.119.111)

A Romano-British leather shoe from the City of London


A Romano-British leather shoe from the City of London, from the founding collection of the Pitt Rivers Museum
During August, we are publishing through this blog a series of new photographs taken by archaeological photographer Ian Cartwright for an online Image Gallery created with the support of the Arts and Humanities Research Council. You can read more about the gallery here, and you can see the whole gallery online here.

Here is the caption for this image:

This is a Romano-British leather shoe (top and bottom view) with iron hobnails. The text written onto it in red ink – “ROMAN SOLDIER CALIGA, LONDON WALL, 22 FT IN PEAT DEC 11 1866” – refers to Pitt-Rivers’ pioneering salvage recording, undertaken during the construction of  during the construction of the Gooch and Cousens wool warehouse on the south side of London Wall, opposite Finsbury Circus in the City of London. 

The deep excavations revealed organic materials preserved in waterlogged deposits. The Pitt Rivers Museum holds more than 250 objects recovered during this salvage archaeology, including copper alloy pins, needles and spoons; a wide range of iron objects; Romano-British and post-Roman ceramics; animal bone and bone tools; samples of wooden piles; human remains, and leather shoes such as these.  

Pitt-Rivers wrongly thought the site was a ‘lake village’ that was the stronghold of Cassivellaunus – the chieftain who led defence against Julius Caesar in 54 BC. A soldier himself, General Pitt-Rivers’ recording of a Roman military boot (caliga) conveys a sense of his imaginative interest in archaeological evidence of the encounters between prehistoric and Roman populations.
(Pitt Rivers Museum Accession Number 1884.92.42).

A Neolithic polished stone axe from Lancing, West Sussex


A Neolithic polished stone axe from Lancing, West Sussex, from the founding collection of the Pitt Rivers Museum
During August, we are publishing through this blog a series of new photographs taken by archaeological photographer Ian Cartwright for an online Image Gallery created with the support of the Arts and Humanities Research Council. You can read more about the gallery here, and you can see the whole gallery online here.

Here is the caption for this image:
Two museum catalogue numbers are written onto this Neolithic stone axe from West Sussex. One matches a museum manuscript catalogue entry from 1882: “4 flint celts Lancing 2.7.79 - 98/9680”. Two historic labels are attached. “Pol.” simply records that it is a polished stone axe. “Lancing nr Brighton” refers to the site, near the town of Worthing, of excavations by James Medhurst in the 1820s. Cross-referencing textual sources, we can place this object at a Sotheby’s auction on 2.7.1879, at which we know Pitt-Rivers bought other items. The catalogue listed items from “the Museum formed by the late Mr James Medhurst of Worthing”. The axe’s multiple texts thus link Pitt-Rivers’ metropolitan collection with an earlier provincial history of archaeological fieldwork and collecting. (Pitt Rivers Museum Accession Number 1884.123.37)​

A stone axe from Cissbury, West Sussex


Image: A stone axe from Cissbury, West Sussex, from the founding collection of the Pitt Rivers Museum
During August, we are publishing through this blog a series of new photographs taken by archaeological photographer Ian Cartwright for an online Image Gallery created with the support of the Arts and Humanities Research Council. You can read more about the gallery here, and you can see the whole gallery online here.

Here is the caption for this image:

Pitt-Rivers’ fieldwork at the Neolithic site of Cissbury in West Sussex in 1867-8 is less well known that his more famous excavations at Cranborne Chase later in his life. It was one of the first field projects to be directed by Pitt-Rivers. But in his account of Ninety Years of Archaeological Discovery, written in 1932, archaeologist J.L. Myers suggested that 'systematic excavation in Britain began with Pitt-Rivers’ work at Cissbury'. 

This Neolithic flint axe offers some textual evidence to support the claim that Cissbury was one of the first modern scientifically recorded archaeological excavation. Attached to it is a pre-printed label, completed by hand: “CISSBURY PIT NO. 22 FEB 4 1868 ALF”. The label is a very early example of the recording of archaeological features or contexts from which objects were recovered. 

This modest 150-year-old label is just as significant as the Stone Age axe to which it is glued – perhaps more so. The letters “ALF” stand for Augustus Lane Fox – as the fieldwork was undertaken before the General took his full name, Augustus Lane Fox Pitt-Rivers. 

(Pitt Rivers Museum Accession Number 1884.125.153).

A Ceramic Tile from Kent


Image: a ceramic tile from Castle Hill, Folkestone, Kent, excavated by Pitt-Rivers in 1878
During August, we are publishing through this blog a series of new photographs taken by archaeological photographer Ian Cartwright for an online Image Gallery created with the support of the Arts and Humanities Research Council. You can read more about the gallery here, and you can see the whole gallery online here.

Here is the text for this image:

This abraded ceramic tile, of Romano-British or post-Roman date, is from Pitt-Rivers’ fieldwork at Castle Hill in Folkestone, Kent in 1878. Initially believing its earthworks (known locally as ‘Caesar’s Camp’) dated from the Roman invasions of Britain, his excavations revealed the monument in fact to be a medieval timber castle. Four different museum catalogue numbers are present, and a hand-written label describes the circumstances of discovery. The label reads: FRAGMENT OF NORMAN OR ROMAN TILE FOUND IN INTERIOR SLOP TO UPPER RAMPART WEST END BENEATH NORMAN CARVING CAESAR’S CAMP FOLKESTONE JUNE 26TH 1878 THE ONLY PIECE FOUND IN THE CAMP. Written for museum display, the label’s text retains elements of the General’s interpretive challenges in the field – singling out this possibly Romano-British find from a site that proved to be medieval in date, and describing the monument as a ‘camp’ (a term suggesting a prehistoric hillfort or Roman military camp) rather than a castle. (Pitt Rivers Museum Accession Number 1884.138.25)

A ceramic bowl from the Thames

A ceramic bowl from the Thames, from the founding collection of the Pitt Rivers Museum

During August, we are publishing through this blog a series of new photographs taken by archaeological photographer Ian Cartwright for an online Image Gallery created with the support of the Arts and Humanities Research Council. You can read more about the gallery here, and you can see the whole gallery online here.

Here is the caption for this image:

This shell-tempered ceramic bowl has been partially reconstructed after Pitt-Rivers acquired it, and (apart from two museum catalogue numbers) it bears one single word, painted onto the outside: THAMES. Many objects from Pitt-Rivers’ collection are recorded simply with the provenance of the River Thames – which may mean an object recovered from dredging the river, may imply it was found on the Thames foreshore in London or along the banks of the river further upstream, or even may represent a purposefully vague provenance given by a dealer that usefully removes any possibility of coming from privately owned land. Whatever the case for this object, there is no doubt that today the modern text has become an integral part of this medieval artefact. (Pitt Rivers Museum Accession Number 1884.35.38)​

Image/Object/Text: an AHRC Image Gallery

Image: screen grab from the new online image gallery of objects from Pitt-Rivers' English archaeological collections, hosted by AHRC
Today sees the launch of an online Image Gallery published by the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC), showcasing 12 new photographs of English archaeological objects from the founding collection of the Pitt Rivers Museum.  The gallery builds directly on primary documentation work undertaken as part of the Excavating Pitt-Rivers project, and funded by Arts Council England through the Designation Development Fund. Our collaboration with photographer Ian Cartwright was funded by AHRC. A summary of the project is below.

The Pitt Rivers Museum is Oxford University’s Museum of Anthropology and World Archaeology. Founded in 1884 with a donation of c. 26,500 objects by General Augustus Lane Fox Pitt-Rivers, today the Museum holds more than half a million objects.  Pitt-Rivers was a key figure in the development of modern scientific archaeology, but his own archaeological collections have received little attention and less than 5% are on display in the Museum. To start to address this historic neglect, between November 2012 and December 2013 Dan Hicks ran a project, funded through a grant from the Designation Development Fund of Arts Council England (ACE), titled Excavating Pitt-Rivers. Working in the Museum stores, the project documented the English archaeological material collected by General Pitt-Rivers between c. 1865 and 1880. The project team documented some 10,696 archaeological artefacts from across England and published them on the Museum’s online database. In most cases, this is the first time that the objects have been examined since they came to Oxford in 1884.

This basic process of collections-based documentation and enhancement has made  possible this new image gallery, Image/Object/TextOne unexpected outcome of the Excavating Pitt-Rivers project was been a realization that Pitt-Rivers wrote on almost every object that he excavated – and that this text was re-written and added to by other curatorial hands from the 1870s into the 20th century, sometimes creating complex layers of hand-written text and printed labels, the idea of turning archaeological objects into a kind of manuscript record is one interesting way of thinking about Pitt-Rivers’ innovations in scientific archaeology, and his direct approach to objectivity and documentation.

Inspired by this observation, for this online gallery we invited archaeological photographer Ian Cartwright to work with Museum curators to create twelve new images that explore the different kinds of text that is found on these archaeological objects, excavated by Pitt-Rivers between the 1860s and 1880s.  Dan Hicks has written a series of captions, exploring how each text can be read to reveal elements of the object’s modern life-history, as well as its archaeological past.  Together, the images and captions show how entangled relationships between museum artefacts and their documentation can unfold, blurring the lines between premodern archaeological objects and modern manuscripts, and transforming artefacts into unique kinds of documents. 
You can read more and explore all the images on the AHRC Image Gallery Website

General Pitt-Rivers' English Archaeology, c 1851-1881

Image: a stone axe from Yorkshire collected by Pitt-Rivers before 1884 (Pitt Rivers Museum accession number 1884.123.326)

General Pitt-Rivers' English Archaeology, c.1851-1881

In April, Beth Asbury joined the Excavating Pitt-Rivers project to work on its next phase, which is funded by ESRC for one year and is run in partnership with the Portable Antiquities Scheme at the British Museum

Beth has a BA in Ancient History and Archaeology and an MPhil in Egyptology. She worked for the Institute for Archaeologists and the Egyptian Ministry of State for Antiquities before to coming to the Pitt Rivers Museum. Beth will be building upon the work of project researchers Carlotta Gardner and Judy White, consolidating the information known so far about the English artefacts collected by Pitt-Rivers before 1881, and sharing it in a two-way exchange with Historic Environment Records officers, with the wider archaeological community, and with the public.

Approximately 10,986 archaeological artefacts have now been identified in the collections of the Pitt Rivers Museum as having been collected, excavated or otherwise acquired by the General from at least 269 individual named sites. What is emerging is a more picture from the c. 64 English excavation sites identified by Mark Bowden in his pioneering study of Pitt-Rivers' archaeological activities more than 20 years ago (1991: 57-94). Building on Mark's excellent study, we are using museum artefacts themselves as primary evidence of the General's archaeological activities.

Image: Map showing Pitt-Rivers’ archaeological sites up to c. 1881 as identified by Mark Bowden (1991: 59, 68). Our project is expanding by more than 200 the number of sites shown on this map.

Our provisional list of sites is below, ordered by English region and ceremonial county.  We are now seeking to add to our understanding of these sites - their precise locations, other antiquarian activity in the areas, etc. Created through detailed collections-based research – mainly site names, dates and other information physically written on objects – the list is a significant expansion of our previous understanding of the English archaeological activities of Pitt-Rivers. In the coming months, in knowledge exchange partnerships with Historic Environment Records and the British Museum’s Portable Antiquities Scheme, Beth will be adding detail to our understanding of each of these sites and the circumstances of antiquarian investigation of them. 

At some sites, Pitt-Rivers actually excavated or collected objects during field walking. At others, the fieldwork may have been done by other antiquarians or others. Our project aims to add to our understanding of the assembling of this national collection during the 1850s, 1860s and 1870s, during the earliest years of Pitt-Rivers' archaeological career. In many cases, the only evidence of Pitt-Rivers' engagement with these sites is represented by the objects themselves - so we are undertaking a kind of archaeology of Pitt-Rivers' own fieldwork, looking outwards from the museum across the country.

If you are familiar with the early archaeological investigations of any of the sites listed below, and wish to contribute information to the project, please do send an e-mail to dan.hicks@prm.ox.ac.uk.

SOUTH-EAST ENGLAND

East Sussex and West Sussex
East Sussex: Mount Caburn
East Sussex: Ranscombe Camp
East Sussex: Seaford
East Sussex: Castle Hill Hillfort, Newhaven, Lewes
East Sussex: “One mile west of Newhaven”, Lewes
East Sussex: Plumpton Plain
East Sussex: Mount Harry
East Sussex: Southerham
East Sussex: Newmarket Hill, Kingston near Lewes
East Sussex: Telscombe
East Sussex: Bishopstone
East Sussex: Blackcap
East Sussex: ‘Downs at Falmer’
East Sussex: Southease [Southese]
East Sussex: Hillfort near Bel Tour Lighthouse, Birling Gap and Beachy Head
East Sussex: Seven Sisters
East Sussex: Beachy Head
East Sussex: Wealden
East Sussex: Hollingbury Castle Camp Hillfort
East Sussex: Long Barrow at Beacon Hill
East Sussex: Sedlescombe Hoard
East or West Sussex: South Downs
West Sussex: Cissbury Ring
West Sussex: Highdown Hill
West Sussex: Forty Acre Farm
West Sussex: Worthing
West Sussex: Lancing
West Sussex: Lancing Hill
West Sussex: Black Burgh Barrow
West Sussex: Chanctonbury Ring
West Sussex: Wolstonbury Hill
West Sussex: Bramber

Kent
Castle Hill (Caesar’s Camp), Folkeston
East Wear Bay
Brickearth Pit at St Peter’s
Fieldwalking near Broadstairs
Minster in Thanet
Reculver
‘Pudding Pan Rock’
Bigbury Wood, Canterbury
Kit’s Coty House
Chatham
Richborough Castle
Hampton on Sea, Herne Bay
Knockholt Beeches, Sevenoaks
Kentish Knock Buoy, Thames Estuary

Surrey
Postford Farm
St Martha’s Hill
Warren Farm and St. Catherine’s Hill
White Lane Farm
Whitmoor Common
Merrow Down
Peasmarsh
Stoke Quarry
Stoke Park
Guildford
New Barn Farm
St. Giles’s Church
Tangley Farm, Guildford
Uplands
Reigate
Redhill, Reigate
Wanborough Manor
Chinthurst Hill, Wonersh
Opposite Hampton Court Palace, East Molesey
River Thames at Chertsey, Runnymede

Oxfordshire
Standlake
Ditchley
Devil’s Pool, Ditchley
Callowhill, Stonesfield
Shipton-under-Wychwood
Dorchester Dykes
Dorchester on Thames
Sinodun Hill Camp
Little Wittenham
Long Wittenham
79-84 High Street, Oxford
Wayland’s Smithy, Ashbury

Hampshire
St Catherine’s Hill Hillfort
South Wonston Long Barrows, Winchester
South Wonston
Andover
Weyhill, Andover
Moody’s Down Long Barrows           
Barton Cliff, Barton on Sea
Hayling Island
Hill Head, Stubbington
Southampton

Berkshire
Worlebury Camp Hillfort
Kintbury

GREATER LONDON

London Wall
Gooch and Cousens Wool Warehouse
London Wall
Great Winchester Street

Palaeolithic Material from the Thames Valley, West London
London Borough of Ealing: Acton
London Borough of Ealing: Acton Green
London Borough of Ealing: Acton Main Line Railway Station
London Borough of Ealing: Acton Village
London Borough of Ealing: Brown’s Orchard
London Borough of Ealing: Church Field
London Borough of Ealing: Friar’s Place Lane
London Borough of Ealing: Mill Hill
London Borough of Ealing: Acton Station
London Borough of Ealing: West Ealing (Ealing Dean)
London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham: East Acton
London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham: Brick Field at Shepherd's Bush
London Borough of Lambeth: Clapham Rise
London Borough of Wandsworth: Battersea Rise
“Thames Valley”

Other Sites in the City of London
Holborn Viaduct (EC1)
Smithfield (EC1)
Bishopsgate (EC2)
Broadgate (EC2)
Tokenhouse Yard, Lothbury (EC2)
Moorfields (EC2)
Old Jewry (EC2)
Mansion House Street, Poultry (EC2)
Bartholomew Lane (EC2)
Cripplegate, London Wall (EC2)
Finsbury Circus (EC2)
Lombard Street (EC3)
Brewer’s Quay, Lower Thames Street (EC3)
Minories (EC3)
Birchin Lane (EC3)
Cannon Street (EC4)
Cannon Street Station (EC4)
Bucklersbury (EC4)
Clement’s Lane (EC4)
Bell Yard, Fleet Street (EC4)
Mansion House (EC4)
Walbrook (EC4)
Billingsgate (E14)
Queenhithe Dock, Thames Street (SE1)

Other sites in Greater London
London Borough of Southwark: Southwark
London Borough of Southwark: Railway Works, Southwark
London Borough of Southwark: Southwark Street
London Borough of Southwark: Borough High Street
London Borough of Waltham Forest: Peat bog, Lee Valley, Walthamstow
London Borough of Waltham Forest: Walthamstow
London Borough of Camden: Queen Square
London Borough of Camden: Lincoln’s Inn, Serle Street
London Borough of Camden: British Museum
London Borough of Camden: Grays Inn Road
London Borough of Richmond: Hampton Court
London Borough of Hounslow: Yeading Brook, Hounslow Heath
City of Westminster: Charing Cross Station
London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham: Wormwood Scrubs
London Borough of Barnet: Mill Hill
London Borough of Croydon: Sanderstead
London Borough of Hackney: Cesspool at Homerton
London Borough of Wandsworth

River Thames in London
City of London: Queenhithe Dock, Thames Street (SE1)
City of London: Cannon Street Station (EC4)
London Borough of Wandsworth: Battersea
London Borough of Wandsworth: Wandsworth
London Borough of Wandsworth: Old Swan Wharf
London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham: Hammersmith
London Borough of Richmond: Hampton Court
London Borough of Lambeth: Westminster Bridge
London Borough of Southwark
London Borough of Tower Hamlets: River Thames at Limehouse

YORKSHIRE AND THE HUMBER

North Yorkshire
Ganton Wold
Ganton Wold or Sherburn Wold
Willerby Wold
Grimston Moor
Weaverthorpe
Kirby Grindalythe
Sherburn
Sleights, Scarborough
Unnamed house, Scarborough
Sharp Howe
York
Richmond
Yorkshire Wolds

East Riding of Yorkshire
Bridlington
Metlow Hill Round Barrow, Bempton
Rudston
Fordon
North Burton
North Burton or East Burton
Langtoft Wold

West Yorkshire
St Helen’s Well, Thorp Arch
Breary Marsh

EAST OF ENGLAND

Suffolk
Brandon
Icklingham
Warren Hill
Mildenhall
Santon Downham
Lakenheath
Elveden
Snape Anglo-Saxon Cemetery
Aldeburgh
Hazelwood Common, Aldeburgh
Hundred River
River Alde
Cretingham
Dunwich
Sutton
Westleton
West Stow Anglo-Saxon Village
Lackford
Euston, St Edmundsbury
Stanton, St Edmundsbury
Wangford, Waveney
Warren Farm
Hoxne
Stonham Aspal or Earl Stonham

Norfolk
Shrubhill Farm Gravel Pits
Little Ouse River Valley
Thetford
Grimes Graves
Broomhill Gravel Pit
Larling
Worstead Common
Eaton, Norwich
Trowse Newton, Norwich

Bedfordshire
Maiden Bower Hillfort
Bedford

Essex
Wallbury Camp
Colchester
Pitchbury Ramparts, Great Horkesley

Cambridgeshire
Swaffham Prior or Swaffham Bulbeck
Wicken
Whittlesey, Fenland

Hertfordshire
Unlocated

SOUTH-WEST

Dorset
Jordan Hill, Weymouth
Weymouth
Portland
East Burton

Wiltshire
Stonehenge
Unnamed tumulus near Stonehenge
Milford Hill, Salisbury
St Andrew’s Church, Bemerton
High Field, Salisbury
Roundway
Cranborne Chase

Gloucestershire
Uley Bury Hillfort
Fairford

Devon
Hopes Nose, Torquay
Hawkchurch Railway Ballast Pit
Guildhall, Exmoor National Park
Grimspound, Teinbridge
Spinsters Rock, Drewsteignton

Somerset
Somerset: Wookey Hole
Somerset: West Buckland Bronze Hoard
Bath and North-East Somerset: Little Solsbury Hill Fort
North Somerset: Banwell Bone Cave

Cornwall
Lanyon Quoit
Men-an-Tol
Chun Quoit
Beacon at Camborne
Trethery Quoit, St Cleer
Merry Maidens Stone Circle

NORTH-WEST

Cheshire
Alderley Edge
Chester

Cumbria
Cliburn
Blencow Beacon, Penrith
Wath, Silloth
Longlands, Hekset Newmarket
Ambleside, Westmoreland

Merseyside
Calderstones Chambered Tomb, Calderstones Park

WEST MIDLANDS

Shropshire
Wroxeter
Corvedale, Much Wenlock
Petton
Shrewsbury

EAST MIDLANDS

Derbyshire
Miller’s Dale

Lincolnshire
Unnamed barrow(s)

Northamptonshire
Raunds or St. Peter’s Church, Northampton


Reference

Bowden, M. 1991. Pitt Rivers: The Life and Archaeological Work of Lieutenant-General Augustus Henry Lane Fox Pitt Rivers, DCL, FRS, FSA. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.