Image: Table of the various sections and sub-sections of Anthropological science according to my view of the matter” by General Augustus Pitt-Rivers: Copyright Bodleian Library, Acland Papers d92, fol. 90.
As part of the research for the Excavating Pitt-Rivers project, the team has worked through primary manuscript sources as well as documenting objects in the museum collection. Archives and manuscripts are often considered as different kinds of evidence from artefacts, but this kind of distinction was alien to General Pitt-Rivers own approach - and the project team, informed by historical archaeology, has tried to approach manuscript sources as just another kind of material evidence.
With this approach in mind, in Spring 2013, as part of the Excavating Pitt-Rivers project Dan Hicks wrote this paper, about a previously unpublished drawing made by General Pitt-Rivers in 1882. The drawing shows the discipline of anthropology as consisting of four fields - Physical Anthropology, Ethnology, Culture and Archaeology - and pre-dates the 'four-field' model of anthropology associated with Franz Boas by some 24 years. This idea of anthropology as including archaeology has remained important for North American archaeology, while during the 20th century more commonly archaeology and anthropology took different directions in Europe.
The paper is published in open access form online by the journal Current Anthropology, includes a supplement that provides a transcription of the letter written by Pitt-Rivers that accompanies the drawing, outlining his view of the organisation and teaching of the discipline.
The drawing is a unique insight into the early transatlantic exchanges in the development of anthropology as an academic subject. The Current Anthropology paper argues that museums, as places that require the physical organisation of knowledge in material form, were key locations at which classificatory approaches in anthropology came to start to classify anthropological knowledge. It also explores the kind of disciplinary histories that can be written from museums and archives.
You can read the paper on the Current Anthropology website here - http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/673385
The abstract of the paper is below:
"The four-field model of anthropology is conventionally understood to have begun with a paper read by Franz Boas in St. Louis in 1904. Publishing for the first time a drawing made by Augustus Pitt-Rivers in England in 1882, this paper rethinks this proposition by making two arguments. First, the paper explores the role of the classificatory anthropology of the 1870s and 1880s on both sides of the Atlantic in the emergence of the idea of organizing anthropological knowledge. It suggests that this emergence was bound up with the problem of classifying anthropological knowledge in material form in European and North American museums. Second, the paper considers how our knowledge of the discipline's past can develop from the study of objects and documents (rather than only through rereading anthropologists' published texts), in a manner akin to documentary archaeology. In this respect, the anthropological problem of organizing knowledge in material form is still with us, but with a new challenge: How adequate are our current forms of disciplinary historiography for the use of material evidence? Rather than proposing a new set of “charter myths,” the paper explores writing the history of four-field anthropology as a form of material culture studies or historical archaeology (in other words, as a subfield of anthropology), working with the “time warps” created by museums and archives in which disciplinary history is not always already written." Continue reading at Current Anthropology
studying the archaeological collections made by Augustus Henry Lane Fox Pitt-Rivers
Pitt-Rivers' field diaries
The
P-series of documents from the Pitt-Rivers archive, which is currently on loan to the Pitt Rivers Museum from the Salisbury & Wiltshire Museum, consists of
various notes and drafts written by Pitt Rivers, most of which were subsequently published. Over the past month, Maria Temporal has been
transcribing the documents from this archive that are most relevant to the Excavating Pitt-Rivers project. Below is her
summary of one of the papers.
Document P23 is a day-by-day manuscript account of Pitt Rivers’ excavations at Cissbury Ring, on the South Downs in West Sussex, over five days in April 1875. Pitt-Rivers describes the
excavation of a ditch and the various artefacts recovered from different layers of the ditch fill. He also describes the excavation of two intercutting pits, and earthworks in the environs of the site.
![]() |
Pitt-Rivers' field sketches ceramics found in 'Pit 2' at Cissbury, West Sussex (Document P23, folio 7). |
The account includes sketches and drawings of sections of the ditch and the pits, such as that reproduced above. His day-by-day field diary presents his ongoing interpretation of the site, including his account of a large earthwork feature on which further work might be undertaken in the future. These field diaries provide a vivid account of the General in the field. As the project progresses, these accounts will help the interpretation of the objects from these excavations which survive in the Pitt Rivers Museum founding collection.
Pitt-Rivers in London
image: Archaeological sections drawn by General Pitt-Rivers at the Gouch and Cousens Warehouse, London Wall (EC2, City of London) in Autumn 1866. From Lane Fox 1867a: figures 2-4.
The Excavating Pitt-Rivers team is continuing to work on documenting the archaeological collections made by General Pitt-Rivers across England during the 1860s and 1870s. As we move forward with this, we have written this piece on his activities in Greater London for the newsletter of the London and Middlesex Archaeological Society (LAMAS), introducing the Excavating Pitt-Rivers project and giving some overview of the London material. This includes extensive early salvage archaeology undertaken in the City of London, and Palaeolithic archaeology in west London and Acton. A full report, detailing each site and object from Greater London, will be published here later in 2013.
We'll be giving a talk to the Society at 6.30pm on 8 October 2013, at the Museum of London's Clore Learning Centre (EC2Y 5HN; nearest tube: Barbican). For further details, contact LAMAS
Pitt-Rivers in London
General Augustus Henry Lane Fox Pitt-Rivers (1827-1900)
is well known as a collector of archaeological and ethnographic material, as
the founder of the Pitt Rivers Museum at the University of Oxford (founded
1884), as a pioneer in archaeological fieldwork, and as a writer on ideas of
typology and change in material culture over time. His significance in
excavation and recording techniques is well known from his fieldwork on his
estate at Cranborne Chase in the 1880s and 1890s. Less well known is the wide
range of fieldwork that he undertook at sites across England during the 1860s
and 1870s (Bowden 1991: 57-94).
Our current project, funded by Arts Council England, is
documenting objects from the founding collection of the Pitt Rivers Museum to
provide a new account of this early fieldwork, undertaken while the General was
in his 30s and 40s, and before he unexpectedly inherited his title and
inheritance in 1881 – when he was known only as Augustus Henry Lane Fox. The
English archaeological collections have never been a principal focus of
research at the Museum, and the vast majority of objects have been unstudied
for 130 years. In this respect they represent a distinctive kind of 19th-century
archaeological assemblage, as well as collections from earlier periods of
English archaeology – which is why we gave the project the title Excavating Pitt-Rivers.
The founding collection of the Pitt Rivers Museum comprises
some 26,000 objects, around 70% of which are archaeological. Material from
other sources acquired by the Museum after 1884, which includes more than
280,000 objects, does not form part of the present project (but see Hicks and
Stevenson 2013).
Around two thirds (10,500) of the 16,600
archaeological objects in the Pitt Rivers founding collection are from England.
These objects, together with documentary records and published accounts of
excavations, represent a unique record of Pitt-Rivers’ changing techniques of
acquiring and recording objects. Some objects were bought at auction or
acquired from other collectors. Many others were obtained through site visits,
and small and larger-scale excavations. The largest single assemblage is from
the large-scale excavation of a medieval castle at Castle Hill (Caesar’s Camp) in
1878.
Material from Greater London forms a very significant
element of the early Pitt-Rivers collections. The General was a Londoner for
most of his life, living at various houses in Belgravia and Kensington
including 10 Upper Phillimore Gardens and 4 Grosvenor Gardens during the 1860s
and 1870s. He was an active member of learned societies, including the
Ethnological Society of London, the Society of Antiquaries of London, and the
Archaeological Institute. His archaeological and ethnological collection was first shown to the public in London - at Bethnal Green Museum (now the V&A Museum of Childhood) from 1874-1878 and at South Kensington Museum from 1878-1882 - before being donated to the University of Oxford
Documenting the Pitt-Rivers’ London collections has
highlighted his use of salvage or early rescue archaeology, especially in
relation to groundworks for railway construction, during the 1860s. Extensive
collections of Roman and post-Roman material from London Wall made in 1866-7
were published by him (Lane Fox 1867a, 1867b). His interpretation of timber
piles as the evidence of a lake village was incorrect, but more than 300
objects from the fieldwork survive at the Pitt Rivers Museum, including 20
skulls (see Marsh and West 1981).
There is also salvaged material, collected by
him and acquired from others, from other sites in the City of London (including
Broad Street Station (now Broadgate), Cannon Street Station, Bishopsgate,
Bucklersbury, Clement’s Lane Finsbury Circus, Fleet Street Lothbury (Tokenhouse
Yard), Lombard Street, Lower Thames Street (Brewer’s Quay), Mansion House
Minories, Moorfields, Old Jewry, Poultry and Smithfield.
Beyond the City, there
are objects and assemblages from railway works in Southwark (SE1), from a peat
bog in Walthamstow (E17), from Old Swan Wharf in Wandsworth (SW11), from
Lincoln’s Inn (WC2), from Shepherd’s Bush – and even a leather bottle recorded
as found in a cesspool in Homerton.
There are also some 74 later prehistoric,
Romano-British and post-Roman objects recorded as from the River
Thames in London, including bone, ceramic, iron and stone objects, three bronze
axes and two bronze swords.
As well as this material, there are Palaeolithic
collections made by Pitt Rivers during a survey of the gravels of the lower
Thames Valley in west London between 1869 and 1872, including more than 125
stone tools from Acton and Ealing (Roberts 2013: 197; Lane Fox 1869, 1872).
Image: "Sketch map of part of the Thames valley, from Acton to near Chiswick and to the Thames at Kew", showing sections opened by Pitt-Rivers (A-K). From Lane Fox 1872, Figure 1).
By enhancing the documentation of the earliest
excavated and collected archaeological material acquired by Pitt-Rivers, the Excavating Pitt-Rivers project explores
the significance of museum collections for re-thinking the history of
archaeological fieldwork. In London, the collections hold unique evidence for
the beginnings of salvage archaeology and collecting practices that would be
continued by the Guildhall Museum in the 20th century, and for Pitt-Rivers’
interests in Romano-British, post-Roman and Palaeolithic archaeology. Where the
material has been acquired from other antiquarians, such as the c. 17 objects
from the City of London acquired by Pitt-Rivers from James Clutterbuck around
1870, there are new histories to tell – in this case, about the connection of
Clutterbuck (Rector of Little Wittenham) with Pitt-Rivers’ involvement in
protests about the destruction of the Dorchester Dykes, and the growing
awareness of ideas of preservation and salvage in this period (Lane Fox 1870).
The Excavating Pitt-Rivers project team will be giving
a talk about the project to the London and Middlesex Archaeological Society on
8 October 2013, at the Museum of London's Clore Learning Centre (6.30pm). The
talk will provide a more detailed overview of the project, and Pitt-Rivers’
activities in London. Pitt-Rivers was President of LAMAS in the early 1880s,
which is another reason why we are excited to be able to look back on his work
in London, and to speak to the Society in October.
References
Bowden, M. 1991. Pitt
Rivers: the life and archaeological work of Lieutenant-General Augustus Henry
Lane Fox Pitt Rivers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hicks, D. and A. Stevenson (eds) 2013. World Archaeology at the Pitt Rivers Museum: a characterization. Oxford: Archaeopress.
Lane-Fox, A.H. 1867a. A description of certain piles found near London Wall and Southwark, possibly the remains of Pile Buildings. Journal of the Anthropological Society of London 5: lxxi-lxxxiii.
Hicks, D. and A. Stevenson (eds) 2013. World Archaeology at the Pitt Rivers Museum: a characterization. Oxford: Archaeopress.
Lane-Fox, A.H. 1867a. A description of certain piles found near London Wall and Southwark, possibly the remains of Pile Buildings. Journal of the Anthropological Society of London 5: lxxi-lxxxiii.
Lane Fox, A.H. 1867b. Objects found
at great depth in the vicinity of the old London Wall. Archaeological
Journal 24: 61-64.
Lane-Fox, A.H. 1869. On the
Discovery of Flint Implements of Palaeolithic type in the gravel of the Thames
Valley at Acton and Ealing. Report: British Association for the
Advancement of Science for 1869: 130-132.
Lane Fox, A.H. 1870. On the
Threatened Destruction of the British Earthworks near Dorchester, Oxfordshire.
Journal of the Ethnological Society of London 2(4): 412-416.
Lane-Fox, A.H. 1872. On the
discovery of Palaeolithic Implements, in connection with Elephas
primigenius in the gravels of the Thames Valley at Acton. Journal
of the Geological Society of London 28: 449-466.
Marsh, G. and B. West
1981. Skullduggery in Roman London? Transactions of the London &
Middlesex Archaeological Society 32: 86-102.
Roberts, A. 2013. Palaeolithic British Isles. In D.
Hicks and A. Stevenson (eds) World
Archaeology at the Pitt Rivers Museum: a characterization. Oxford:
Archaeopress, pp. 169-215.
A Romano-British medical set
![]() |
Roman medical implements. (left to right: PRM 1884.140.530, 1884.140.531, 1884.140.1532 &1884.140.509) |
Four Roman medical implements have recently been catalogued and researched as part of the Excavating Pitt-Rivers project. These implements are made of copper alloy and would have been cast and then hammered into shape. These objects are recorded as being from London Wall where we know Pitt-Rivers completed excavations in 1865, 1866 and 1867.
The two implements on the left are waisted leaf-shaped spatulas; they would have been used to mix and apply ointments to patients. Sometimes the spatula was also used as a cautery, as a tongue depressor and as a blunt dissector (Baker 2009).
The two implements on the right are spoon probes with olivary ends. These are similar to the spatula probe, but have narrow leaf shaped spoons in place of the spatula. The spoon could have been used for a number of different purposes to remove medicines from containers, to mix ointments, as a curette and possibly in lithotomy operations. The olivary end could also be used to mix ointments, to create a drip effect, to explore fistula and examine carious bone. (Baker 2009).
More information on these particular objects and other Roman medical implements can be found in this paper by Patricia Baker.
Pitt-Rivers in Acton
The time
Pitt-Rivers spent in London is of particular interest to the project. Not only
is the material he collected of great interest, ranging from Paleolithic flint
implements to medieval ceramics, it also provides a wealth of information about
his collecting methods.
The
Excavating Pitt-Rivers team has just started working on the stone implements
that were recovered during the General’s fieldwork at Acton in 1869, 1870, 1871 and 1874. He was specifically
interested in this area due to the flint implements that were being recovered
and he believed they were a link between Palaeolithic and Neolithic technologies.
The flint implements that we hold at the PRM were collected both by Pitt-Rivers
and also acquired from workmen, excavating brick-earth, who were shown examples of the types of stone implements that might be found.
![]() |
One of the many stone implements collected from Acton, High Terrace Gravel (PRM 1884.122.333). |
Whilst examining
and cataloguing the stone tools a section of the Acton High Terrace Gravel,
drawn by Pitt-Rivers, was discovered. In this section he illustrates the
geological strata and marks where he found ‘the sharp flakes’. Along with this a number of labels were
discovered that were clearly used when displaying the specimens found in the
Acton area.
![]() |
A section drawn, by Pitt-Rivers in 1871, of the Acton, High Terrace Gravel where he collected a number of flit implements. |
The
material collected has very detailed labeling and we hope to pin-point when and
where Pitt-Rivers was in Acton.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)